Afficher la notice abrégée

Psychological consequences of female genital mutilation: A mixed-method systematic review

dc.rights.licenseCC0en_US
dc.contributor.authorTara Reman
dc.contributor.authorValerie Balligand
dc.contributor.authorBenoit Schoefs
dc.contributor.authorVeronique Feipel
dc.contributor.authorJeanne Bertuit
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T10:58:49Z
dc.date.available2024-12-20T10:58:49Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-07
dc.identifier.issn2410-8219en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://luck.synhera.be/handle/123456789/2947
dc.identifier.doi10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1877en_US
dc.description.abstractSouth African Journal of Physiotherapy, vol 79, (2023), n°1en_US
dc.description.abstractenBackground: Female genital mutilation (FGM/C) defined as ‘all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons’ is a cultural practice having several consequences on women’s health. Medical and sexual consequences have been documented, but the link between FGM/C and the development of psychological symptoms is not clearly established. The influence of contextual factors is poorly understood. Objectives: To evaluate the psychological impact of FGM/C and how victims experience it. Method: A mixed method systematic review was conducted. The inclusion criteria were observational primary studies involving women who had undergone FGM/C and had experienced psychological symptoms. Publication bias was assessed by using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A configurative strategy that involved a comparison of quantitative and qualitative data was used, followed by an analysis of causal link between FGM/C and induced psychological disorders. Results: Fourteen studies were included. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety and somatisation showed a significantly higher prevalence in women who have experienced FGM/C versus non-mutilated women. Female genital mutilation type II or III were identified as predictors of disorder severity. Qualitative studies showed a significant difference in the perception of FGM/C between immigrant and non-immigrant women, as well as the multidimensional nature of the factors influencing disorders’ onsets. Conclusion: Our study showed a high association of FGM/C (and its degree of severity) with psychological disorders such as PTSD, depression, anxiety and somatisation. It also illustrates contextual factors, including socio-cultural factors that may influence the intensity of these psychological disorders. Clinical implications: It is important for health professionals to be aware of the psychological consequences of FGM/C and the different factors influencing FGM/C perception. Indeed, a feeling of ‘Being abnormal’ can be awakened among patients because of health professionals’ incorrect behaviours.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipINTen_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherAOSISen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSouth African Journal of Physiotherapyen_US
dc.rights.uriinconnuen_US
dc.subject.enfemale genital mutilation; cutting; mental health; psychological symptoms; mixed method systematic review.en_US
dc.titlePsychological consequences of female genital mutilation: A mixed-method systematic reviewen_US
dc.title.enPsychological consequences of female genital mutilation: A mixed-method systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeArticle scientifiqueen_US
synhera.classificationSciences du vivanten_US
synhera.institutionHE Libre de Bruxelles Ilya Prigogineen_US
synhera.cost.totalinconnuen_US
synhera.cost.apcinconnuen_US
synhera.cost.compinconnuen_US
synhera.cost.acccompinconnuen_US
dc.description.versionOuien_US
dc.rights.holderinconnuen_US
synhera.identifier.orcidwork138289361


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée