Afficher la notice abrégée

Bilateral Strength Deficit Is Not Neural in Origin; Rather Due to Dynamometer Mechanical Configuration

dc.rights.licenseCC1en_US
dc.contributor.authorSimoneau-Buessinger, Emilie
dc.contributor.authorLeteneur, Sébastien
dc.contributor.authorToumi, Anis
dc.contributor.authorDessurne, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorGabrielli, François
dc.contributor.authorBarbier, Franck
dc.contributor.authorJakobi, Jennifer M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T08:14:35Z
dc.date.available2021-06-15T08:14:35Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-18
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://luck.synhera.be/handle/123456789/1062
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145077en_US
dc.description.abstractDuring maximal contractions, the sum of forces exerted by homonymous muscles unilaterally is typically higher than the sum of forces exerted by the same muscles bilaterally. However, the underlying mechanism(s) of this phenomenon, which is known as the bilateral strength deficit, remain equivocal. One potential factor that has received minimal attention is the contribution of body adjustments to bilateral and unilateral force production. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the plantar-flexors in an innovative dynamometer that permitted the influence of torque from body adjustments to be adapted. Participants were identically positioned between two setup configurations where torques generated from body adjustments were included within the net ankle torque (locked-unit) or independent of the ankle (open-unit). Twenty healthy adult males performed unilateral and bilateral maximal voluntary isometric plantar-flexion contractions using the dynamometer in the open and locked-unit mechanical configurations. While there was a significant bilateral strength deficit in the locked-unit (p = 0.01), it was not evident in the open-unit (p = 0.07). In the locked-unit, unilateral torque was greater than in the open-unit (p<0.001) and this was due to an additional torque from the body since the electromyographic activity of the agonist muscles did not differ between the two setups (p>0.05). This study revealed that the mechanical configuration of the dynamometer and then the body adjustments caused the observation of a bilateral strength deficit.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNoneen_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPLOS ONEen_US
dc.rights.uri1932-6203en_US
dc.subjectMuscle Strength Dynamometeren_US
dc.subjectIsometric Contractionen_US
dc.subjectAnkle jointen_US
dc.subjectTorqueen_US
dc.titleBilateral Strength Deficit Is Not Neural in Origin; Rather Due to Dynamometer Mechanical Configurationen_US
dc.typeArticle scientifiqueen_US
synhera.classificationSciences de la santé humaine>>Sciences de la motricitéen_US
synhera.institutionHE Condorceten_US
synhera.otherinstitutionLaboratoire d'Automatique, de Mécanique et d'Informatique industrielles et Humaines (LAMIH)–UMR CNRS 8201, Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut-Cambrésis (UVHC), Valenciennes, Franceen_US
synhera.otherinstitutionSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, Canadaen_US
synhera.cost.total/en_US
synhera.cost.apc/en_US
synhera.cost.comp/en_US
synhera.cost.acccomp/en_US
dc.description.versionOuien_US
dc.rights.holderSimoneau-Buessinger et al.en_US


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée