Afficher la notice abrégée

Benefits of a regular physical activity in chronic low back pain patients during a controlled collective treatment versus autonomous self-monitoring

dc.rights.licenseCC6en_US
dc.contributor.authorJAMOTTE, Axelle
dc.contributor.authorTUBEZ, François
dc.contributor.authorDORBAN, Gauthier
dc.contributor.authorJACQUEMIN, Denis
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-30T11:51:55Z
dc.date.available2020-06-30T11:51:55Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://luck.synhera.be/handle/123456789/275
dc.description.abstractPoster présenté lors du 9th biennal congress of the Belgian Back Societyen_US
dc.description.abstractenThe treatment strategies of Low Back Pain (LBP) are constantly evolving. Physical activities are nowadays recognized as an efficient approach considering LBP treatment Primary goal was to determine how a regular physical activity could be efficient in non-specific chronical LBP post-treatment. Secondary aim was to make a comparison between a collective and monitored treatment and an individual and self-controlled follow-up 24 non-specific LBP patients, who have completed back school sessions, were randomized into 3 groups. A control group (CG, n=9), with no change in everyday activities. One collective treatment group (CTG, n=7) participating 2 sessions of 45 min/week including a walking session and an aqua-gym session. One individual treatment group (ITG, n=8) where patients had to achieve 10.000 steps/day in an autonomous way (controlled by pedometer). Oswetry (ODI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), Sorensen and Ito-Sirado tests were performed at the beginning of the study (T0) and after 6 weeks (T1) All groups were statistically identical at the beginning. For all items, no statistically improvement was found for the control group (CG). For the ODI, the evolution for the CTG (p=0,0078) and the ITG (p=0,0156) were significant. The results of the TSK were also enhanced with respectively p=0,0078 (CTG) and p=0,0039 (ITG). The Sorensen’s results have increased from 71±40 seconds to 103±27 seconds (p=0,0156) for the CTG and from 65±36 seconds to 102±37 (p=0,0039) for the ITG. The results for the CG came down from 72±29 seconds to 65±26 seconds (p=0,4062). For the Ito-Shirado, only the CTG have shown a significant (p=0,0306) positive evolution. CTG and ITG were statistically different from CG at T1 Considering the results, the benefits of a regular physical activity, in groups or individual, for patient suffering from non-specific chronical LBP could be attested. CTG has a more significant evolution than ITGen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNoneen_US
dc.format.mediumeBOen_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherBelgian Back Society (BBS)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectChronic low back painen_US
dc.subjectRegular physical activityen_US
dc.subject.enActivité physique régulièreen_US
dc.subject.enLombalgie chroniqueen_US
dc.titleBenefits of a regular physical activity in chronic low back pain patients during a controlled collective treatment versus autonomous self-monitoringen_US
dc.title.frBénéfices d'une activité physique régulière chez les patients lombalgiques chroniques lors d'un traitement collectif contrôlé versus autosurveillance autonomeen_US
dc.typeActe de conférence ou de colloqueen_US
synhera.classificationSciences de la santé humaine>>Sciences de la motricitéen_US
synhera.institutionHE Robert Schumanen_US
dc.description.versionOuien_US
dc.rights.holderBelgian Back Society (BBS)en_US


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

CC6
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que CC6