Afficher la notice abrégée

“Debriefing and Organizational Lessons Learned” (DOLL): A Qualitative Study to Develop a Classification Framework for Reporting Clinical Debriefing Results

dc.rights.licenseCC0en_US
dc.contributor.authorPAQUAY, M
dc.contributor.authorDubois, N.
dc.contributor.authorDiep, A.-N.
dc.contributor.authorGraas, G.
dc.contributor.authorSassel, T.
dc.contributor.authorPiazza, J.
dc.contributor.authorSERVOTTE, Jean-Christophe
dc.contributor.authorGhuysen, A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-12T12:08:03Z
dc.date.available2022-07-12T12:08:03Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issnhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.882326en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://luck.synhera.be/handle/123456789/1638
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 crisis has radically affected our healthcare institutions. Debriefings in clinical settings provide a time for the clinicians to reflect on the successes (pluses) and difficulties (deltas) encountered. Debriefings tend to be well-received if included in the broader management of the unit. The goal of this study was to develop a framework to categorize these debriefings and to assess its worthiness.MethodsA qualitative approach based on a grounded theory research method was adopted resulting in the “Debriefing and Organizational Lessons Learned” (DOLL) framework. Debriefings were conducted within two Emergency Departments of a Belgian University Hospital during an 8-week period. In the first step, three researchers used debriefing transcripts to inductively develop a tentative framework. During the second step, these three researchers conducted independent categorizations of the debriefings using the developed framework. In step 3, the team analyzed the data to understand the utility of the framework. Chi-square was conducted to examine the associations between the item types (pluses and deltas) and the framework's dimensions.ResultsThe DOLL is composed of seven dimensions and 13 subdimensions. Applied to 163 debriefings, the model identified 339 items, including 97 pluses and 242 deltas. Results revealed that there was an association between the frequency of pluses and deltas and the dimensions (p < 0.001). The deltas were mainly related to the work environment (equipment and maintenance) (p < 0.001) while the pluses identified tended to be related to the organization of the unit (communication and roles) (p < 0.001). With leadership's support and subsequent actions, clinicians were more enthusiastic about participating and the researchers anecdotally detected a switch toward a more positive organizational learning approach.ConclusionThe framework increases the potential value of clinical debriefings because it organizes results into actionable areas. Indeed, leadership found the DOLL to be a useful management tool. Further research is needed to investigate how DOLL may work in non-crisis circumstances and further apply the DOLL into incident reporting and risk management process of the unit.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOTHen_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Medicineen_US
dc.relation.isreferencedbyhttps://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/292683en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2268/292683en_US
dc.subjectDebriefingsen_US
dc.subjectOrganizatinal learningen_US
dc.subjectHospital managementen_US
dc.subjectsafetyen_US
dc.subjectqualityen_US
dc.title“Debriefing and Organizational Lessons Learned” (DOLL): A Qualitative Study to Develop a Classification Framework for Reporting Clinical Debriefing Resultsen_US
dc.typeArticle scientifiqueen_US
synhera.classificationSciences de la santé humaine>>Sciences infirmièresen_US
synhera.institutionHENALLUXen_US
synhera.otherinstitutionULiègeen_US
synhera.cost.total0en_US
synhera.cost.apc0en_US
synhera.cost.comp0en_US
synhera.cost.acccomp0en_US
dc.description.versionOuien_US
dc.rights.holderULiègeen_US


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée