dc.rights.license | CC0 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | DIERICK, Frédéric | |
dc.contributor.author | PIERRE, Amélie | |
dc.contributor.author | Profeta, Loredana | |
dc.contributor.author | Telliez, Frédéric | |
dc.contributor.author | BUISSERET, Fabien | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-06T13:26:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-06T13:26:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-11-22 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://luck.synhera.be/handle/123456789/1523 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111605 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: COVID-19 has affected the practice of physiotherapy, and telerehabilitation (TR) may be seen as an alternative model of care if it is accepted by patients and physiotherapists. This study investigates the perceived usefulness of TR and the intention to use it among physiotherapists and patients from Belgium and France concerned with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) during the pandemic period. Methods: An online questionnaire based on the technology-acceptance model was designed. Sociodemographic data were collected and Likert scales were proposed to assess perceived ease-of-use, perceived usefulness and intention to use TR. Data were collected between 17 January and 17 March 2021; 68 patients and 107 physiotherapists answered. Results: In total, 88% of patients and 76% physiotherapists had not used TR at the time they answered. Only 12% of patients and 1% of physiotherapists are willing to use TR, and 50% of physiotherapists think they will never use TR compared to 25% of patients. A total of 98% of participants agreed that they had a good mastery of the technological tools requested. Conclusions: Physiotherapists are more reluctant to use TR than patients, regardless of convincing EBM results. This is related to their own representation of proper MSD management, which must include the use of hands-on techniques. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | EUR | en_US |
dc.language.iso | EN | en_US |
dc.publisher | MDPI | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Healthcare | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.subject | telerehabilitation | en_US |
dc.subject | musculoskeletal disease | en_US |
dc.subject | survey | en_US |
dc.subject | e-health | en_US |
dc.subject | acceptability | en_US |
dc.title | Perceived Usefulness of Telerehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Belgium–France Pilot Study during Second Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic | en_US |
dc.type | Article scientifique | en_US |
synhera.classification | Ingénierie, informatique & technologie | en_US |
synhera.institution | CeREF Technique | en_US |
synhera.otherinstitution | UMONS | en_US |
synhera.otherinstitution | Henallux | en_US |
synhera.otherinstitution | UPJV | en_US |
synhera.otherinstitution | Rehazenter | en_US |
synhera.otherinstitution | UCL | en_US |
synhera.otherinstitution | UNamur | en_US |
synhera.stakeholders.fund | Interreg FWVl NOMADe | en_US |
synhera.cost.total | 1220 | en_US |
synhera.cost.apc | 1220 | en_US |
synhera.cost.comp | 0 | en_US |
synhera.cost.acccomp | 0 | en_US |
dc.description.version | Oui | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | MDPI | en_US |