Afficher la notice abrégée

A Comparative Study of Non-Destructive Testing Techniques: Active Thermography versus Shearography for 3D-Printed Thermoplastic Composites Reinforced with Continuous Carbon Fiber

dc.rights.licenseCC1en_US
dc.contributor.authorOchana, Imi
dc.contributor.authorDucobu, François
dc.contributor.authorKhalil Omrani, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorNotebaert, Arnaud
dc.contributor.authorDEMARBAIX, Anthonin
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-14T15:23:15Z
dc.date.available2025-01-14T15:23:15Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-11
dc.identifier.issn2504-4494en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://luck.synhera.be/handle/123456789/2984
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp8050227en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract: "This study investigates the feasibility and effectiveness of two non-destructive testing methods, active thermography and shearography, on 3D-printed thermoplastic (TP) composites reinforced with continuous carbon fiber. Artificial defects were introduced into the composite plate to benchmark the detection capabilities of these non-destructive testing techniques (NDT). Active thermography produced a thermogram that highlighted defects through variations in surface temperature. Although effective for identifying defects ranging from 3 to 10 mm in size at four different depths, specifically 1 mm, 1.25 mm, 1.5 mm, and 1.75 mm, through the thickness of a 2.8 mm plate, the method encountered some limitations. It faced challenges in detecting deeper defects and accurately determining their shapes. Shearography, which utilizes fringe pattern distortions to detect surface displacement anomalies, successfully identified near-surface defects within the same size range. However, it required more expertise for accurate interpretation and struggled with detecting smaller and deeper defects. The complementary strengths and limitations of these methods suggest that employing both could offer a more comprehensive solution for defect detection in 3D-printed TP composites."en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipREGen_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Manufacturing and Materials Processingen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectactive thermographyen_US
dc.subjectshearographyen_US
dc.subject3D printingen_US
dc.subjectcontinuous carbon fiberen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Study of Non-Destructive Testing Techniques: Active Thermography versus Shearography for 3D-Printed Thermoplastic Composites Reinforced with Continuous Carbon Fiberen_US
dc.typeArticle scientifiqueen_US
synhera.classificationIngénierie, informatique & technologie>>Multidisciplinaire, généralités & autresen_US
synhera.institutionHE Condorceten_US
synhera.otherinstitutionMachine Design and Production Engineering Lab, UMONS Research Institute for Materials Science and Engineering, University of Monsen_US
synhera.stakeholders.fundFinancement: Région Wallone SW_ICOM2C3Den_US
synhera.cost.total954,55en_US
synhera.cost.apc954,55en_US
synhera.cost.comp0en_US
synhera.cost.acccomp0en_US
dc.description.versionOuien_US
dc.rights.holderDemarbaix et al.en_US


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

CC1
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que CC1