• Open Access
    • Comment cela fonctionne?
    • Ouvrir une session
    • Contact

    Voir le document

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Voir le document 
    • Accueil de LUCK
    • HE Bruxelles-Brabant
    • HE2B - HE
    • Santé
    • Voir le document
    • Accueil de LUCK
    • HE Bruxelles-Brabant
    • HE2B - HE
    • Santé
    • Voir le document
    Voir/Ouvrir
    DOMS 2023 jfmk-08-00146.pdf (3.694Mo)
    Date
    2023-09-12
    Auteur
    Gussoni, Maristella
    Moretti, Sarah
    Vezzoli, Alessandra
    Genitoni, Valerio
    Giardini, Guido
    BALESTRA, Costantinoorcid-id
    Bosco, Gerardo
    Pratali, Lorenza
    Spagnolo, Elisabetta
    Montorsi, Michela
    Mrakic-Sposta, Simona
    Metadata
    Afficher la notice complète
    Partage ça

    Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS): Evidences from Laboratory and In-Field Studies

    Résumé
    Intense, long exercise can increase oxidative stress, leading to higher levels of inflammatory mediators and muscle damage. At the same time, fatigue has been suggested as one of the factors giving rise to delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a specific electrical stimulation (ES) treatment (without elicited muscular contraction) on two different scenarios: in the laboratory on eleven healthy volunteers (56.45   4.87 years) after upper limbs eccentric exercise (Study 1) and in the field on fourteen ultra-endurance athletes (age 47.4   10.2 year) after an ultra-running race (134 km, altitude difference of 10,970 m+) by lower exercising limbs (Study 2). Subjects were randomly assigned to two experimental tasks in cross-over: Active or Sham ES treatments. The ES efficacy was assessed by monitoring the oxy-inflammation status: Reactive Oxygen Species production, total antioxidant capacity, IL-6 cytokine levels, and lactate with micro-invasive measurements (capillary blood, urine) and scales for fatigue and recovery assessments. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in the time course of recovery and/or pre–post-race between Sham and Active groups in both study conditions. A subjective positive role of sham stimulation (VAS scores for muscle pain assessment) was reported. In conclusion, the effectiveness of ES in treating DOMS and its effects on muscle recovery remain still unclear.

    Parcourir

    Tout LUCKCommunautés & CollectionsAuteurTitreDate de publicationSujetType de documentTitre de périodiqueThématiqueCette collectionAuteurTitreDate de publicationSujetType de documentTitre de périodiqueThématique

    Mon compte

    Ouvrir une sessionS'inscrire

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Plan du site

    • Open Access
    • Comment cela fonctionne?
    • Mon compte

    Contact

    • L’équipe de LUCK
    • Synhera
    • CIC