• Open Access
    • Comment cela fonctionne?
    • Ouvrir une session
    • Contact

    Voir le document

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Voir le document 
    • Accueil de LUCK
    • HE Bruxelles-Brabant
    • HE2B - HE
    • Santé
    • Voir le document
    • Accueil de LUCK
    • HE Bruxelles-Brabant
    • HE2B - HE
    • Santé
    • Voir le document
    Voir/Ouvrir
    2021_LVD-automation.pdf (1.687Mo)
    Date
    2021-03-02
    Auteur
    Markley, Eric
    Germonpré, Peter
    BALESTRA, Costantinoorcid-id
    Tillmans, Frauke
    Denoble, Petar
    Freiberger, Jake
    Moon, Richard
    Dayton, Paul
    Papadopoulou, Virginie
    Metadata
    Afficher la notice complète
    Partage ça

    A fully automated method for late ventricular diastole frame selection in post-dive echocardiography without ECG gatingEr

    Résumé
    Venous gas emboli (VGE) are often quantified as a marker of decompression stress on echocardiograms. Bubble-counting has been proposed as an easy to learn method, but remains time-consuming, rendering large dataset analysis impractical. Computer automation of VGE counting following this method has therefore been suggested as a means to eliminate rater bias and save time. A necessary step for this automation relies on the selection of a frame during late ventricular diastole (LVD) for each cardiac cycle of the recording. Since electrocardiograms (ECG) are not always recorded in field experiments, here we propose a fully automated method for LVD frame selection based on regional intensity minimization. The algorithm is tested on 20 previously acquired echocardiography recordings (from the original bubble-counting publication), half of which were acquired at rest (Rest) and the other half after leg flexions (Flex). From the 7,140 frames analyzed, sensitivity was found to be 0.913 [95% CI: 0.875-0.940] and specificity 0.997 [95% CI: 0.996-0.998]. The method's performance is also compared to that of random chance selection and found to perform significantly better (p precedes0.0001). No trend in algorithm performance was found with respect to VGE counts, and no significant difference was found between Flex and Rest (p>0.05). In conclusion, full automation of LVD frame selection for the purpose of bubble counting in post-dive echocardiography has been established with excellent accuracy, although we caution that high quality acquisitions remain paramount in retaining high reliability.

    Parcourir

    Tout LUCKCommunautés & CollectionsAuteurTitreDate de publicationSujetType de documentTitre de périodiqueThématiqueCette collectionAuteurTitreDate de publicationSujetType de documentTitre de périodiqueThématique

    Mon compte

    Ouvrir une sessionS'inscrire

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Plan du site

    • Open Access
    • Comment cela fonctionne?
    • Mon compte

    Contact

    • L’équipe de LUCK
    • Synhera
    • CIC